Since you have only provided the title "Article 100 in Constitution of India" and the date "26 January 1950", and stated it is a Constitution Article case, I can only provide a general explanation of Article 100 of the Constitution of India. A specific case summary requires details about the parties involved, the specific dispute, and the court's judgment.

Here is a general summary based on the information provided:

Short Summary

Article 100 of the Constitution of India deals with voting in Houses, power of Houses to act notwithstanding vacancies and quorum. It primarily addresses the rules and procedures for conducting business in Parliament and State Legislatures, including how decisions are made through voting, the validity of proceedings despite vacancies, and the minimum number of members required to be present for a meeting to be valid (quorum).

Facts

As this is a constitutional provision and not a specific case, there are no specific facts in the traditional sense. The "facts" are the circumstances that led to the inclusion of Article 100 in the Constitution during its drafting. These circumstances relate to the need for clear rules for legislative proceedings and decision-making.

Issues

The core issues addressed by Article 100 are:

• How are decisions made in the Houses of Parliament and State Legislatures?
• What happens if there are vacancies in the House?
• What is the minimum number of members required for a valid meeting (quorum)?

Petitioner's Arguments

Since this is not a case, there is no petitioner. However, during the drafting of the Constitution, proponents of Article 100 would have argued for the necessity of these provisions to ensure the orderly functioning of the legislature. They would have emphasized the need for clear rules on voting, quorum, and the validity of proceedings.

Respondent's Arguments

Similarly, there is no respondent. However, during the drafting process, potential counter-arguments might have focused on the specific thresholds for quorum or the potential for these rules to be used to obstruct legislative business.

Court's Reasoning

As this is not a court case, there is no court reasoning. However, the inclusion of Article 100 in the Constitution reflects the Constituent Assembly's understanding of parliamentary procedure and the need for rules to govern legislative decision-making. The Assembly likely considered various models and precedents before settling on the specific provisions of Article 100.

Conclusion

Article 100 stands as a fundamental provision governing the internal procedures of the Indian Parliament and State Legislatures. It ensures that legislative business can be conducted effectively and legitimately, even in the face of vacancies or fluctuating attendance. The specific rulings related to Article 100 would arise in cases where the interpretation or application of its provisions is challenged.