Since you have provided a case title referring to Article 107 of the Indian Constitution and indicated it's a constitutional article rather than a specific court case, I will provide a summary explaining Article 107 itself, as that seems to be the intent. If you intended a specific case about Article 107, please provide the full case name.

Short Summary

Article 107 of the Indian Constitution outlines the provisions regarding the introduction and passing of Bills in the Parliament, excluding Money Bills which are governed by Article 109. It details the procedure for a Bill to become an Act of Parliament.

Facts

Article 107 is a foundational provision within Part V (The Union) Chapter II (Parliament) of the Indian Constitution. It doesn't arise from a specific factual scenario but rather establishes the legal framework for legislative action.

Issues

The primary issue addressed by Article 107 is how a Bill (a proposed law) is introduced, debated, and passed in either House of Parliament (Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha) and eventually becomes law after receiving the President's assent. Key issues include:

• The requirements for introducing a Bill.
• The stages a Bill must pass through in each House.
• The circumstances under which a Bill lapses.

Content of Article 107

Article 107 contains the following provisions:

(1) Subject to the provisions of articles 109 and 117 with respect to Money Bills and other financial Bills, a Bill may originate in either House of Parliament.

(2) Subject to the provisions of articles 100 and 111, a Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses of Parliament either with amendments or without amendments, if it has been agreed to by both Houses.

(3) A Bill pending in Parliament shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the Houses.

(4) A Bill pending in the Council of States which has not been passed by the House of the People shall not lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.

(5) A Bill which is pending in the House of the People, or which having been passed by the House of the People is pending in the Council of States, shall, subject to the provisions of article 108, lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.

Court's Reasoning

Since Article 107 is a constitutional provision, there is no specific "court reasoning" in the traditional sense. Its interpretation and application are determined by the courts when specific disputes arise concerning the legislative process. The courts would interpret the language of the article, considering the intent of the framers of the Constitution and established principles of statutory interpretation.

Conclusion

Article 107 provides the basic framework for the legislative process in India. It clarifies where Bills can originate, how they are considered passed, and when they lapse. It is a crucial article for understanding how laws are made in India.