I am unable to provide a summary of a case titled "Article 162 in Constitution of India" with a court listed as "Constitution Article" and a date of 26 January 1950. This is because:
- Article 162 is a provision of the Constitution, not a court case. Article 162 deals with the extent of the executive power of a State. It doesn't represent a specific legal dispute adjudicated by a court.
- The date is problematic. While the Constitution came into effect on January 26, 1950, it's highly improbable that a case solely concerning the interpretation of Article 162 would have been decided on the very first day of the Constitution's operation. Court cases require time to be filed, argued, and decided.
- The court designation is unclear. "Constitution Article" is not a valid designation for a court. Cases involving the interpretation of the Constitution are typically heard by the High Courts or the Supreme Court of India.
To provide a helpful summary, I would need the actual case name (e.g., State of [X] v. [Y]) and the specific court that heard the case. If you're interested in understanding how Article 162 has been interpreted, I can provide information on landmark cases that have discussed its scope and application, provided you give me the names of those cases.
