Since you have only provided the title "Article 268 in Constitution of India" and the court as "Constitution Article" along with the date "26 January 1950", and no actual case content, I can only provide a general explanation of Article 268. A proper case summary requires details about a specific legal dispute.
Short Summary
Article 268 of the Constitution of India deals with duties levied by the Union but collected and appropriated by the States. It outlines a specific arrangement for the distribution of revenue generated from certain taxes. There is no specific court case associated with the article itself on the date of its enactment; rather, it is a constitutional provision.
Facts
Article 268 was part of the original Constitution of India adopted on January 26, 1950. It addresses the division of financial resources between the Union (Central Government) and the States. The article aims to provide states with an independent source of revenue.
Issues
The primary issue addressed by Article 268 is the allocation of taxing powers and revenue distribution between the Union and the States. It seeks to balance the financial needs of both levels of government.
Arguments (Hypothetical)
Since this is a constitutional provision and not a specific case, there are no petitioner/respondent arguments. However, during the drafting of the Constitution, arguments likely revolved around:
Court's Reasoning (Hypothetical)
As a constitutional provision, there was no "court reasoning" in the traditional sense. However, the framers of the Constitution likely considered the following:
Conclusion
Article 268 stands as a constitutional provision outlining the framework for the levy of certain duties by the Union, but their collection and appropriation by the States. It is a key element of India's fiscal federalism. No specific ruling was made on January 26, 1950, as it was the date of the Constitution's adoption.
Get instant answers specific to this case