Okay, I will provide a summary based on the provided information. Please note that the provided information is extremely limited and lacks the usual details of a court case (e.g., parties involved, specific factual scenario). Given the title "Article 164(1A) in Constitution of India" and the date of January 26, 1950, it's likely this refers to the adoption of Article 164(1A) as part of the Constitution, rather than a specific case interpreting it. Therefore, the summary will reflect that context.

Short Summary

This entry concerns the adoption of Article 164(1A) into the Constitution of India. Article 164(1A) mandates that in the states of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha, there shall be a Minister in charge of tribal welfare who may also be in charge of the welfare of the Scheduled Castes and backward classes.

Facts

The Constitution of India was adopted on January 26, 1950. Article 164 deals with other provisions as to Ministers. Subsequently, Article 164(1A) was added to the Constitution (though the date of this addition is not specified in the prompt). This addition was intended to ensure the welfare of tribal populations and other disadvantaged groups in specific states.

Issues

The primary issue surrounding Article 164(1A) was the need to constitutionally guarantee representation and focused attention on the welfare of Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, and backward classes in states with significant tribal populations.

Petitioner's Arguments

(Assuming this refers to the arguments for including the article during the constitutional debates): Proponents likely argued that a constitutional mandate was necessary to ensure these vulnerable populations received adequate attention and resources from the state governments. They likely highlighted the historical neglect and marginalization of these communities.

Respondent's Arguments

(Assuming this refers to arguments against including the article during the constitutional debates): Opponents may have argued that such a specific provision infringed on the autonomy of state governments or that existing provisions were sufficient to address the needs of these communities. They may have also raised concerns about the potential for creating special privileges.

Court's Reasoning

Since this is about the adoption of a constitutional article and not a court case, there is no court reasoning in the traditional sense. The "reasoning" behind the inclusion of Article 164(1A) would be the Constituent Assembly's belief that it was essential for the protection and advancement of tribal populations and other disadvantaged groups in the specified states. This was based on considerations of social justice and equality.

Conclusion

Article 164(1A) was included in the Constitution of India, mandating the appointment of a Minister in charge of tribal welfare in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha. This provision aimed to ensure focused attention and resources for the welfare of Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, and backward classes in these states.