Okay, I will create a summary based on the provided case information, adhering to the specified format and guidelines.

Short Summary

Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, concerns the power of the court to order a separate trial where numerous persons have the same interest in one suit. It allows the court to manage complex litigation efficiently by preventing the suit from becoming unmanageable due to the number of parties involved. The section empowers the court to direct that one or more of such persons may sue or be sued, or may defend such suit, on behalf of all parties interested.

Facts

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of the Courts of Civil Judicature. Section 30 specifically addresses situations where multiple individuals share the same interest in a single lawsuit. The need arises from the potential for unwieldy and inefficient proceedings when all interested parties are directly involved.

Issues

The central issue is the interpretation and application of Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, regarding the court's power to allow representative suits. Specifically, the issues revolve around:

1. What constitutes "same interest" among multiple parties?
2. Under what circumstances should the court exercise its discretion to allow a representative suit?
3. What are the procedural safeguards to ensure the interests of all parties are adequately protected in a representative suit?

Petitioner's Arguments

Since this is about the section itself, arguments would concern its interpretation and application. Possible arguments supporting a broad interpretation of Section 30 might include:

• It promotes judicial efficiency by avoiding multiplicity of suits.
• It reduces costs for all parties involved.
• It allows for a more manageable and focused trial.
• It is a necessary tool for addressing collective grievances.

Respondent's Arguments

Arguments against a broad interpretation or application of Section 30 might include:

• It could prejudice the rights of individual parties who are not directly represented.
• It may lead to inadequate representation of diverse interests within the group.
• It could violate the principles of natural justice if individuals are bound by a decision without their explicit consent or participation.
• It requires careful scrutiny to ensure the representative party adequately protects the interests of all concerned.

Court's Reasoning

(Since the case content is simply the section itself, I will provide a hypothetical reasoning based on established legal principles and the purpose of the section.)

The court would likely reason that Section 30 is a procedural mechanism designed to balance the interests of judicial efficiency with the need to protect the rights of individual litigants. The "same interest" requirement necessitates a common grievance and a desire for a similar remedy. The court must exercise its discretion judiciously, considering factors such as the number of parties involved, the complexity of the issues, and the potential for conflicts of interest among the parties. Adequate notice to all interested parties is crucial to ensure they have an opportunity to object or participate. The court retains the power to intervene if the representative party is not adequately protecting the interests of all concerned.

Conclusion

Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, empowers the court to order a separate trial where numerous persons have the same interest in one suit. The court can allow one or more persons to sue or be sued on behalf of all interested parties, provided that the "same interest" requirement is met, and adequate safeguards are in place to protect the rights of all concerned. The application of this section is subject to the court's discretion and must be exercised judiciously to ensure fairness and efficiency. No specific relief is granted as this is an explanation of the section itself.