It appears there's a misunderstanding. "Section 35 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860" is not a court case title. It's a section within the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Therefore, I cannot provide a case summary in the format requested. Section 35 itself defines the concept of "When such an act is criminal by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention." It essentially states that if several people are involved in a criminal act, and the act is criminal because of the knowledge or intention of those involved, each person who participates in the act with that knowledge or intention is liable for the act in the same manner as if the act were done by him alone with that knowledge or intention.

To provide a helpful response, I need an actual case name where Section 35 of the IPC was interpreted or applied. For example, a case like Barendra Kumar Ghose v. Emperor would be suitable. If you provide a valid case name, I can create the summary you requested.